<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.stress-free.co.nz"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>stressfree - bentley</title>
 <link>https://www.stress-free.co.nz/tech/bentley</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Bentley/AutoCAD Market Visibility</title>
 <link>https://www.stress-free.co.nz/bentley_autocad_market_visibility</link>
 <description>
  &lt;div class=&quot;field-body&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;image&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/default/files/images/thesis/autodesk_vs_bentley.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;AutoDesk vs Bentley&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;207&quot; height=&quot;97&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Given our recent meeting with Bentley promotors this article seemed quite relevant. It deals with the different marketing (or non-marketing) strategies employed by the two companies and their different user bases. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;Article:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://aecnews.com/news/2005/12/22/1322.aspx&quot;&gt;Why Bentley Seems Invisible to AutoCAD Users    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;ul class=&quot;field-taxonomy-vocabulary-1&quot;&gt;

      &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;/thesis&quot;&gt;thesis&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;/tech/autodesk&quot;&gt;autodesk&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href=&quot;/tech/bentley&quot;&gt;bentley&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;/li&gt;
  
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 02:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">192 at https://www.stress-free.co.nz</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
